Ethics Opinon 1977-5
I
QUESTION PRESENTED
1. Should
the members of the Permanent Committee of the Lawyer Referral
Service (hereinafter "LRS") and the Board of Directors
of the San Diego County Bar Association (hereinafter "Association")
and the members of their respective firms be disqualified
from receiving referrals during the period in which they
serve as a committee member and/or director?
2. Briefly
describe the rules of operation of an LRS.
II
ANALYSIS
A. Minimum
Standards for a Lawyer Referral Service in California
The
Board of Directors of the State Bar of California (hereinafter
"State Bar") have adopted the "Minimum Standards
for a Lawyer Referral Service in California" (hereinafter
"Standards") effective May 14, 1976. It is the
policy of the State Bar that every community in California
be served by an LRS. (Standards § 1.1) The State Bar
is empowered to authorize a local bar association to establish
and operate an LRS. Such authorization will be granted if
the State Bar is satisfied that the written application
submitted by the local bar association establishes that
the proposed LRS will conform to the Standards. (Standards
§ 2.1) The LRS is to be supervised by a committee or
board of directors (hereinafter the "Committee")
which is empowered to make all management decisions. However,
such decisions are subject to review or modification by
the board of directors of the local association. (Standard
§ 3.1) Committee members are chosen by the local bar
association and may include nonlawyer public representatives;
provided, however, that at least 50% of such members are
active members of the State Bar. (Standards § 3.2)
Membership
on any panel established by the LRS is to be open to all
active members of the State Bar who regularly practice and
maintain an office in the area served. (Standard §
4.1)
The
LRS is to establish a variety of panels which cover the
specialized areas of the law (e.g., criminal law, family
law, patents and trademarks, etc.). (Standards §§
5.1, 5.2)
Each
LRS is required to develop and maintain an active publicity
program which is designed to inform the general public of
the existence, purpose, and benefits of the LRS. (Standards
§ 7.1) The LRS is funded through registration fees
and referral fees received from the panel registrants (Standards
§§ 8.1, 8.2) Extensive records covering the operation
of the LRS must be maintained by same. Each year the LRS
is required to file with the State Bar a report on its activities.
(Standards §§ 9.1, 9.2)
The
Standards also provide three directives with respect to
referral procedures. First, the Committee is required to
establish procedures which assure that each referral is
made in a fair and impartial manner. Second, no referrals
are to be made on the basis of race, sex, age, religion
or national origin. Third, the referrer is prohibited from
making referrals to himself, his associates or employees.
B. Rules
of Operation of the Lawyer Referral Service of the San Diego
County Bar Association
The
revised "Rules of Operation of the Lawyer Referral
Service of the San Diego County Bar Association" (hereinafter
"Rules") became effective January 1, 1977. The
Rules provide for the establishment of a Permanent Committee
to administer the Association's LRS. The Permanent Committee
is comprised of seven lawyers. These seven lawyers include
the Treasurer of the Association with the approval of the
Board of Directors of same. The President and Board Liasion
of the Association are ex-officio members of the Permanent
Committee, however, such members are not entitled to vote.
(Rules Section 3 of Article Two.) The LRS is operated by
a Director and four referrers who are hired and supervised
by the Permanent Committee, subject to the approval and
continuing jurisdiction of the Directors of the Association.
The Director need only make monthly reports to the Permanent
Committee if the same are requested by the Chairman of such
Committee. Referrals are generally made on a rotation basis,
except that geography (i.e. distance between client and
attorney) and fluency in a foreign language are also considerations.
(Rules Section 4 of Article Two.) The person requesting
a referral is given one name from the panel pertaining to
the type of legal problem which such person has. The Association's
LRS currently has 22 separate panels covering a variety
of specialized areas of the law. The largest panel is "Family
Law" which has 246 registered attorneys. The smallest
panel is "Condemnation" which has only two attorneys.
An attorney
who wishes to become a registrant with the LRS is required
to file an application with the same. The Permanent Committee
reviews each application to determine the eligibility of
such applicant for the requested panel membership. (Rules
Section 4 of Article Three.)
Each
registrant with the LRS is required to keep a record which
contains: (i) the name of each client referred to him or
her, (ii) the date of the reference, (iii) the general nature
of the matter referred and (iv) the total fee received.
Upon receipt of the fee or a portion thereof, or upon disposition
of the matter, the attorney must report to the LRS and submit
the appropriate pro rata payment of fees collected. The
LRS is permitted to request written reports from time-to-time
from registrant attorneys handling referred matters. (Rules
Section 11 of Article Three.)
The
Association's LRS has an unwritten rule which provides that
Permanent Committee members are disqualified from receiving
referrals while they serve on such Committee. The Directors
of the Association and the members of the Permanent Committee
have no direct contact with the day-to-day operations of
the LRS. The four women who make referrals were hired by
the Director of the LRS. The Director attempts to avoid
any favoritism in the referral procedures by asking each
applicant for the position of referrer whether such applicant
is related to any attorney in San Diego County. If there
is a strong relationship between the applicant and an attorney
in San Diego County such applicant will not be hired. The
Director estimates that approximately 30 people would be
disqualified from receiving referrals if a rule is adopted
which disqualifies members of the Permanent Committee and
Directors of the Association and the members of their respective
firms from receiving referrals during the period in which
such persons serve as a committee member and/or director.
C. Policy
of Other Lawyer Referral Services
The
LRS of the Southwest Los Angeles Bar Association has a written
rule which prohibits referrals to members of the committee
which administers its LRS. However, said rule has been waived
each year that the LRS has been in operation. It should
also be noted that the Southwest Los Angeles Bar Association
only has fifty members.
There
is an unwritten rule that no referrals may be made to members
of the governing committee of the LRS of the Los Angeles
County Bar Association; but, attorneys from such committee
member's firms are not disqualified. A committee member
who wishes to remain on a panel(s) may obtain a waiver of
the rule against referrals by filing a request for same
with the Board of Trustees of the Bar Association. In the
past, a waiver has been requested and granted in at least
one instance.
The
Orange County Bar Association's LRS has eleven members serving
on its governing committee. Three members serve as a liasion
for the Board of Governors of the Association. Three members
are selected at large and are not registrants with the LRS.
Three other members actually serve on one or more panels.
Finally, two nonattorney members are appointed by and from
the Lawyers Wives Organization. Therefore, eight members
of the governing committee are not registrants with the
LRS. Consequently, the Director of the Orange County Bar
Association's LRS believes that through its system for selecting
members to serve on the governing committee it can avoid
favoritism, and therefore, the three members who are registrants
with the LRS need not be disqualified from receiving referrals.
The
Committee members of the governing committee of the LRS
of the Long Beach Bar Association are permitted to receive
referrals during the time they serve on such committees.
The Director of such LRS believes that committee members
are sufficiently removed from the actual referrals to avoid
any favoritism.
III
CONCLUSION AND PROPOSAL
The
Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California
do not address the narrow question presented to the Legal
Ethics and Unlawful Practices Committee (hereinafter "Ethics
Committee"). The Standards prepared by the State Bar
provide only minimal guidance. Section 6.1 of the Standards
states that referrals shall be made in a fair and impartial
manner. Although referrals by the LRS are made on a rotation
basis, it is the opinion of the Ethics Committee that the
members of the Permanent Committee, as presently constituted,
are so closely connected to the operations of the Association's
LRS that it would be inappropriate for such persons or the
members of their firms to receive referrals. On the other
hand, the directors of the Association are sufficiently
removed from the operations of the LRS and, thus, the Ethics
Committee believes that it would not be inappropriate for
such directors and the members of their firms to receive
referrals.
However,
to avoid even the appearance of impropriety and to assure
that referrals are made in a fair and impartial manner,
the Ethics Committee recommends that the Board of Directors
of the Association adopt the following two proposals for
restructuring the LRS.
It is hereby recommended that the Permanent Committee be
comprised of nine members: the treasurer of the Association,
six lawyers appointed by the President and two nonlawyers
appointed by the President from the public at large. The
six lawyers should consist of two persons who are active
participants in the LRS and four persons (including their
respective firms) who do not so participate. The President
and the Board Liasion should remain as ex officio members
of the Permanent Committee. It is believed that by permitting
membership of a limited number of persons who receive referrals,
that the Bar at once may receive the benefit of their current
experience with the referral process yet, on the other hand,
minimizes the potential for favoritism by the proposed new
structure.
To further
eliminate the possibility of favoritism in referrals, the
Ethics Committee hereby recommends that the following procedures
be established for the Permanent Committee. First, membership
on the Permanent Committee should be for a term of not more
than one or two years. Second, the Permanent Committee should
hold regular monthly meetings. Finally, at such monthly
meetings, the Director of the LRS should make a presentation
concerning the activities of the LRS during the preceding
month.
If the
aforementioned proposals are adopted by the Board of Directors
of the Association, the permanent committee will benefit
from the input of attorneys active in the LRS and from the
participation of lay persons who are leaders in the community.
In addition, the proposed procedural changes will strengthen
the effectiveness of the Permanent Committee.
Disclaimer:
This opinion was issued by the Legal Ethics Committee of
the San Diego County Bar Association. It is advisory only
and is not binding upon any member of the SDCBA, any other
member of the State Bar of California, the State Bar of
California or its Board of Governors, or any persons or
tribunals charged with regulatory responsibilities. The
SDCBA, its officers, directors, agents, and the Legal Ethics
Committee members assume no responsibility or liability
in rendering this opinion.
|